In 2009, the Phoenix Mercury didn't just win a championship—they etched their names into basketball history. But here's where it gets fascinating: it wasn't just about star power; it was about a starting lineup that fired on all cylinders, blending talent, chemistry, and sheer determination. Let's dive into how this dynamic quintet propelled the Mercury to their second WNBA title, and why their story still resonates today.
The Mercury's journey began with a statement win against the San Antonio Silver Stars, a 90-79 victory that showcased their offensive firepower. And this is the part most people miss: it wasn't just Diana Taurasi and Cappie Pondexter leading the charge—though their combined 48 points were undeniable. Taurasi's all-around game (25 points, 3 rebounds, 2 assists, 2 blocks, 2 steals) and Pondexter's playmaking (23 points, 5 assists, 4 rebounds) set the tone. But DeWanna Bonner's bench brilliance (16 points, 11 rebounds) hinted at the team's depth, a factor that would prove crucial later.
Their starting five—Taurasi, Pondexter, Le'coe Willingham, Tangela Smith, and Temeka Johnson—quickly became a force to reckon with. In their second game, a 91-84 win over the New York Liberty, Pondexter took center stage with 26 points, while Taurasi's 21 points and Smith's 18 showcased the lineup's balance. Bonner, the eventual Sixth Woman of the Year, added 13 points, underscoring the team's ability to dominate even when starters rested.
Here's a bold take: While Taurasi and Pondexter often stole the spotlight, it was the consistency of the entire starting unit that kept the Mercury afloat. Take their 90-71 loss to the Sacramento Monarchs—a rare off night for the stars, with Bonner leading the team with just 13 points. Yet, the starters' ability to regroup and bounce back with a 115-104 revenge win against the Monarchs highlighted their resilience.
In that pivotal rematch, every starter scored in double figures, with Taurasi's 31 points, Willingham's 26, and Pondexter's 22 leading the charge. This wasn’t just a team with stars—it was a team where every starter could step up when needed. But here's the controversial question: In today's WNBA, where superteams dominate, could a lineup like Phoenix's 2009 starters still thrive, or is the league now too reliant on individual superstars?
By season's end, the Mercury's 23-11 record and championship trophy spoke volumes. Their starting lineup wasn't just a collection of players—it was a well-oiled machine, each piece contributing to the whole. As we reflect on their legacy, it’s clear: this team didn’t just win games; they redefined what it means to be champions. What’s your take? Could a balanced lineup like theirs succeed in today’s WNBA? Let us know in the comments!
For more insights into the Mercury's historic 2009 season, follow us on X right here: https://x.com/MercuryOnSI!
